Thursday, 24 October 2013

Russell Brand isn't Waking People Up - He is Putting You Back to Sleep


It's always amazing to me how so many people who consider themselves to be 'awake' - still consider their beliefs being stated on the mainstream by a celebrity as being a higher accolade/validation, than any other outlet/research, or even their own convictions.

Russell Brand is a pseudo-intellectual, overpaid, middle-class, media luvvie who is put out there by the BBC and the New Statesman to make you forget all about Jimmy Savile and to quell your anger in a delusional state that he is 'waking others up'. 

Russell Brand is put on the TV screens to placate the ones already 'awake', and to put you back to sleep in the belief that this is some kind of victory. It's isn't - it is showbiz being used as a social engineering tool yet again.

You do not need the BBC or Russell Brand to validate your convictions if you genuinely feel that strongly about them. The truth is already self-evident. No mainstream media, political or celebrity validation required. 

The Jimmy Savile horror show is the ultimate weapon we have in our arsenal which we can wake people up with. The BBC knows this, and so do their owners and personal friends of Jimmy Savile, the Royal Family. So they throw you a 'truth bone' in the form of celebrity Platitude Prosac Performance in the guise of Russell Brand talking about 'revolution' when in reality it's about distraction. 

Do not be bought off with this rubbish. Keep the Jimmy Savile anger raging - it is the key to bringing the whole pyramid down.

Russell Brand's image is also very 'Christ'-like and this is still a very powerful archetype people are wooed by. The Christ image was also utilised by CIA creation Jim Morrison to act as another pied piper for the anti-Vietnam War generation in the mid-late 1960's. This is the same tactic being used again - forget your anger at the system - a celebrity will fight the revolution for you on the telly... 

Although the segment is being marketed as Paxman versus Brand it should be really titled: THE BBC VERSUS YOU (again...).




ADDENDUM TO THIS POST HERE>>>

Thomas Sheridan is an independent alternative artist, author, satirist, musician, public speaker, broadcaster and researcher currently based in the West of Ireland. His illustrations have appeared on the covers of newsstand magazines, books and websites worldwide. 

The Anvil of the Psyche is considered a vital manual for personal and social survival in a world controlled by greed and false hopes. Thomas' writings and interviews have evolutionised people to build a firewall around their own psyche and not to be lured into handing over personal independence to an exterior collective or guru. As a result, his NO CONTACT EVER AGAIN philosophy applied to controlling individuals and groups has made Thomas an enemy of mind-controlled death cults and neo-Nazi fringe groups.  Thomas has also been featured in several films and documentaries. 


136 comments:

  1. oh dear...problems with no solutions and voices of immature inadequacey inciting unthought, unplanned, and ill prepared revolt...hmmm...time to turn backward on your donkey Russ, it'll only get you so far and the problem of an army of likeminded donkeys amounts to unrest you will have nothing to offer in the way of satisfactory steps toward a better world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So many , yes so many need to be awakened

      And as a footnote I detest Paxman

      Delete
    2. Paxman played the part well.
      Two actors, performing a script, the bad guy is doing marvellous work as well.

      Delete
  2. You do not need the BBC or Russell Brand to validate your convictions if you genuinely feel that strongly about them. The truth is already self-evident. No mainstream media, political or celebrity validation required.

    If the truth is already self-evident then what exactly is the point of trying to oust Brand as a media puppet? What's the point of anything, really?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YES!!! I so Agree and couldn't have said it better! Let's focus on the positive!

      Delete
    2. Thomas nailed it...Russell Brand is dating Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith), Jemima's father was Sir James Michael "Jimmy" Goldsmith (26 February 1933 – 18 July 1997) a billionaire financier and tycoon. Jemima has two brothers; Zac Goldsmith Tory MP who is married to Alice ROTHSCHILD, and another brother called Ben Goldsmith, who up until last year was married to wait for it .... drum roll please ... Kate ROTHSCHILD! Best of all, it is alleged Jemima's father James, had a long term affair with Princess Diana's Mother ... Incidentally, Russell Brand made an impassioned plea against BANKERS on NEWSNIGHT only yesterday.

      Listen to Thomas he's right.

      Delete
    3. Well this at least shows he's full of shit - surrounded by the bankers he wants removed...

      Delete
    4. The truth may not already be self evident to some, in fact there are many running around claiming to know the truth and to be so 'awake' yet fall over themselves promoting intel plants like Brand following his every word and recommendation without a single independent thought of their own about the possible consequences. That's why its important to expose all the shills out there, because its needed unfortunately.

      Delete
  3. I do agree with much Mr. Brand has to say. He certainly is frank about many things, but I also do agree with you Thomas, he is a copious media hound and he suffers from a self anointed messiah complex which massively deters from anything relevant he has to say. Shill? Maybe he just traded in his drug addictions for self idolization, does not seem like the controllable type.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That could be a factor. Junkies often become religious fanatics or cult members after they give up the smack/booze addiction.

      Delete
    2. Ooooh how very judgemental and quite a generalisation.... Zzzzzzz

      Delete
    3. He was as high as a kite during that interview - ever thought about where he's getting his drugs from - then you will see who his controllers are, he's very controllable and controlled imo

      Delete
    4. I agree with this statement, there is a little truth in each statement. But I look at it this way, if all the muppets out there watch TV and they follow Russel Brand and it creates some sort of awareness that changes their thought process then its not a bad thing. It might just be enough to make people want to search for more information and start the journey to understanding what is really going on. :)

      Delete
  4. Whatever has happened to you tom .... your so angry and hateful and negative of late , you used to be so inspirational and uplifting .. a breath of fresh air we have so needed for a very long time , now i think id be more uplifted by that psycho Alex jones or mister low vibration of fear himself David icke .... please please lighten up i miss your counsel .. this isnt a slag off dude ................

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But that is not me up there shaking the hand of the root of all the problems...I am not saying that Brand is a bad person - but there is a disturbing amount of NLP in the hypnotic way he talks. He could be owned. For the longest time, I was wondering if there was a wiff of scientology off him.

      What changed me? The Jimmy Savile thing. I had no idea just how sick it was until I started to look in there. You are right to trust no one. It's hard enough to trust one's own opinions and including myself in this considering just how rotten the entire spectacle is.

      Delete
    2. Rubbish mate its not either Russel or Saville. You are just casting it as such in the same way you accuse some imaginary system of casting it. And Russell is not in the remotest way from a middle class background either. I don't need the BBC or Russ to validate my convictions? Did you watch the end of the interview? When I see someone with the same convictions as me articulate them on TV I am happy. I am not saying "so what about Jimmy Saville"? Sure there is a network of paedophiles in high places, that is obvious and its not Russ's fault.

      Delete
    3. Thomas got negative the same time as the paedo bbc stuff came to light, someone has to tell it like it is and Thomas is doing a sterling job, if you really look into it you will be sickened to the core what these people worling for the bbc got up to, oh and least we forget David t-icke-t started his carreer at the bbc, Russell Brand is being set up as the new political voice for the young who follow him ( and he has a lot of followers ), mark my words, that will not be the last we see of Russell, and by the way he is an actor and plays many other roles

      Delete
    4. Thomas nailed it...Russell Brand is dating Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith), Jemima's father was Sir James Michael "Jimmy" Goldsmith (26 February 1933 – 18 July 1997) a billionaire financier and tycoon. Jemima has two brothers; Zac Goldsmith Tory MP who is married to Alice ROTHSCHILD, and another brother called Ben Goldsmith, who up until last year was married to wait for it .... drum roll please ... Kate ROTHSCHILD! Best of all, it is alleged Jemima's father James, had a long term affair with Princess Diana's Mother ... Incidentally, Russell Brand made an impassioned plea against BANKERS on NEWSNIGHT only yesterday.

      Listen to Thomas he's right.

      Delete
    5. ^^^^ comment from above - even I didn't know RB was this much of a hypocrite.

      Delete
    6. ''Although the segment is being marketed as Paxman versus Brand it should be really titled: THE BBC VERSUS YOU (again...).''...exactly.

      Delete
    7. bottom line..we really need to ask ourselves if those who control the flow of information would allow anyone who posed a threat to them near an audience.

      Delete
    8. Youve obviously not listened to Icke,he is not about fear,in fact he is very optimistic and believes the elite will fail.

      Delete
  5. The jimmy savile thing ... yeah know what you mean bud .... have you seen this youtube Nightmares at Elm Guest House. Bill Maloney interviews Chris Fay , holy f**k this evil is everywhere , Brand is very young , even if he brings a handfull of folk around its a gud thing ... anyway thankyou for your courage and hard work dude still think you cud chill a bit lol ... Sean ........

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. When they let a fucker like me on to give my two cents then I'll believe the BBC is an open platform. Another thing I noticed is Sean the way Brand speaks and writes - it's got a hypnotic quality like intense NLP.

      Brand is not talking about the stuff that really frightens the establishment if you really listen - just the usual Occupy state-sanctioned cliches.

      Delete
    3. The BBC will never be an open platform it has a very tight narrative its been spewing for the last 70 years ... not sure about the NLP thing i always saw it as a tool that can be used for good or ill , i must look deeper gerrish has always been very opposed to it .... come to think about it no ive never seen brand really slate anything more than an idea ? did like his hugo boss rant though haha .... sean .....

      Delete
    4. Pretty sure the BBC boys buggering club have all they ciuld ever wish fot to blackmail Brand his sex addiction has certainly got in the way of any intellect. They'll have plenty if peadi/snuff blacmailing material. Otherwise his promotion would not ever have occured.

      Delete
  6. excellent piece, shared.

    watched his interview after seeing it on my newsfeed for the 30th time, and as expected nothing of substance whatsoever. peace & love & unity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Russell Brand shook the Queen's hand and he's a Revolutionary apparently now - I would of called her a 'Parasite' to her face and I'm the one being attacked by Truthers. Very sad.

      Russell Brand the 'revolutionary' is no doubt talking 'Revolution' by a pool in Malibu today basking in the unconditional love of people who still don't have shit. But who are still dependent on the BBC for their opinions.

      Delete
    2. Thomas, only a fool lashes out. a wise man picks his battles. calling the Queen a name would have accomplished nothing. it would not have penetrated her cognitive barriers, and it would have assured that you would never have a public platform with which to reach others again.

      if RB is managing to install revolutionary ideas in rich trust-fund kids, then he's doing a hell of a lot of a better job than you, who are merely preaching to your choir, spiraling deeper into anger and obsolescence. waking up one rich person accomplishes much more than waking up 100 slaves.

      Delete
    3. @Veru ~ Seems as though you're not really quick on the uptake. "Instilling revolutionary ideas" 'is' the agenda not the solution, that's what the oligarchy want, a revolution that they can (and always have) use to their own benefit in moulding society in a tighter ball for them to roll around at their pleasure. I'd suggest getting more informed before attacking someone like Thomas who seems to be at a level way over your head in what's really going on.

      Delete
  7. I agree about the "hypnotic" quality of his delivery at times, but that could just be him presenting HIMSELF. He is after all a celebrity and someone with a media career. It doesn't necessarily mean he is acting on behalf of someone in the shadows as part of some elite pied piper scheme (but I'll admit that is still a possibility). My instinct, for what it's worth, is that he is both self-serving and genuine at the same time. By that I mean that he appears to me to genuinely believe what he says, but that he must also know that this new radical stance will sell books, concert tickets, and DVDs etc.

    As regards his past (meeting the Queen, being part of the celebrity world etc.), again my instinct is that he is just a human being and has changed his philosophy and worldview since then. That seems plausible to me, because my own views have changed. I will admit that I am easily manipulated and have been in the past, so why couldn't that be true of someone like him, too?

    As regards wealth redistribution, yes he is espousing some halfway house in which a benevolent government limits the power and profits of corporations and redistributes wealth. I don't know if such a thing could ever be possible, but I am not going to condemn him just because I don't agree with every last thing he said. Nevertheless, I will be keeping an eye on him and see where this new direction leads. (After all that, you could well be right.)

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's all a matter of perspective! When I watch Russel Brand I don't celebrate that the world is awake, I celebrate that people who aren't are being exposed to buzz words and ideas that have the potential to lead them along their own path of awakening. So to me, I think it's great when celebrities aid in any way. To worship them or to consider them is a free will choice that comes down to each individuals preference. I'm not defending Brand or other celebrities as I do see the materialistic propagation of these figures, but still there is a silver lining. Those who are meant to find it, will find it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. agreed...too many celebrities say nothing,at least he is speaking out.We can be cynical if we wish but if it makes young people question so much the better

      Delete
  9. Well that is 5 minutes of my life I will never get back again. Whilst Rusell Brand is not my favourite person in the world he cetainly made more sense than anyhing I have seen written here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hear hear. Brand is an ego-centric media whore, he admitted as much in his last viral interview. I'm just happy to see ideas which are not normally broadcast reaching people who may not have heard them. Give hiim a break and focus on someone who is actually causing harm.

      Delete
    2. Russell Brand shook the Queen's hand and he's a Revolutionary apparently now - I would of called her a 'Parasite' to her face and I'm the one being attacked by Truthers. Very sad.

      Russell Brand the 'revolutionary' is no doubt talking 'Revolution' by a pool in Malibu today basking in the unconditional love of people who still don't have shit. But who are still dependent on the BBC for their opinions.

      Delete
  10. What's Savile got to do with anything??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know, right? Seriously!

      Delete
    2. Everything.. Go back and study more. You've missed the point entirely.

      Delete
    3. Everything.. Go back and study more. You've missed the point entirely.

      Delete
    4. hahahahaahahahah

      Delete
  11. what do you want Thomas?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Spot on. Brand says a lot without saying much. I think he's being put up as the acceptable face of the alternative media.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I strongly suspect that the Paxo interview with brand was a set-up; Paxo was way to OTT in his criticisms...that said, Ithink it was done with reasonable intentions. No...not denying that Brand is a media-whore - but that interview will serve to bring things to the attention of many people who would otherwise have their heads deeply buries in Candy Crush Saga. I would suggest it would be prudent to embrace all anti-establishment voices and views right now, because there is no easy answer to ridding ourselves of this turbulent public schoolboy elite...and, frankly, anyone who mobilises one single other person into taking action for change is OK in my book

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said - I couldn't agree more.

      Delete
    2. I agree. Every little helps.

      Delete
  14. Spot on. Brand says a lot without saying much. He's being put up as the acceptable face of the alternative media.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I agree, Brand is an egoist & media whore being as a distraction. I wouldn't trust him as far as I could kick him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I used to find Brand an egotistical media-whore. He still is that, he admits as much himself whenever given the chance. However, now I would follow him to Parliament to dismantle that circus of horrors brick by brick. He speaks consistently, truthfully and passionately.

      Delete
  16. How on earth do you expect anyone from the mainstream to speak out on anything, when as soon as they do, you jump on them and start calling them names? And what is wrong with being middle class? Is that a crime now? And a luvvie? Why so judgy? And how is he making you forget Jimmy Savile? Is he mind-controlling you? And why do you want us to keep our anger raging? Anger is not the most productive of states - people act irrationally when they are angry.

    You don't have to accept a single thing that Brand says... but at least he is using his voice to talk about things of importance, and is helping people to think outside the media-enforced paradigm. He wouldn't be my first choice as a critic of the establishment necessarily, and I certainly don't agree with him on many points (I personally find this interview somewhat cringeworthy to be honest)... but I am at least grateful that someone in the mainstream is voicing at least some of the things that need voicing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and if you researched anything into Russel its pretty obvious he isn't in any way middle class either

      Delete
  17. Replies
    1. Russell Brand shook the Queen's hand and he's a Revolutionary apparently now - I would of called her a 'Parasite' to her face and I'm the one being attacked by Truthers. Very sad.

      Russell Brand the 'revolutionary' is no doubt talking 'Revolution' by a pool in Malibu today basking in the unconditional love of people who still don't have shit. But who are still dependent on the BBC for their opinions.

      Delete
    2. God your an angry little man . who the f@ck would let you speak on any British TV programme with your vile ranting turning people into hate filled monsters . your just jealous cos you're not as good looking as brand and probably can't grow a decent beard to tug on in front of your one mate down the pub . anyway why would he be arsed with you Mr invisible.

      Delete
    3. Hypocrite! You are the angry one. Insulting Thomas makes you less of a hate filled monster? Plllllllllleeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaassssseeeeeeee
      think before you type. You've obviously been
      "Russeled up and Branded" Poor fool. He had a very short lived tv show here in the US. He was vile and lude on each show and every interview was sexually charged, he made such a fool of himself, they cancelled him and many people distanced themselves from him. whenever his back is to the wall, he brakes out his flirty, sex talk which makes me vomit in my mouth each time I see it. And that hand shake sure looks Masonic to me. No wonder the Queen is smiling at him. They belong to the same lodge.

      Delete
  18. So many to waken up, so many

    and as a footnote Paxman puts me to sleep, Cant stand this person

    ReplyDelete
  19. OK, so we don't need Russell Brand to validate truth. Does that mean you have to be a bitter-ass punk about him saying true things on TV?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you're obviously a troll now fuck off..

      Delete
  20. They are attempting to control the narrative, as they have always done before. They know the "awakening" is inevitable, so they need to give it just the right suggestive nudges to keep it corralled within limits that conform with the overall agenda. Above all, keep people inadequately informed, give them the false-hope sugar-coated pill (after all, the messianic dude on teevee is saying stuff that hits all the right notes, the "revolution" must be happening, yay now I can go back to living my life and not worry about it), and DON'T let the REALLY NASTY SHIT you and yours are up to, take front and center in their minds.

    Welp, what can you expect? I expect the revolution of awareness to NOT be televised, and NOT to take any predictable, pre-programmed path except in the most mechanical of minds... which still doesn't bode all that well for the masses, but the fate of the soulless lickers of Satan's shit is a much more certain consummation, devoutly to be wished.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Johnny Nineball24 October 2013 14:52

    Erm, CIA-created Jim Morrison? And that's because his father was a US Navy Admiral, right? Presumably this is from the same piece that accuses Black Sabbath of trying to woo us into Satanism by tuning their instruments down to "lower vibrations"? Look, I'm as cynical and paranoid as anybody I know, but this kind of crap gives radicals a bad name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Russell Brand shook the Queen's hand and he's a Revolutionary apparently now - I would of called her a 'Parasite' to her face and I'm the one being attacked by Truthers. Very sad.

      Russell Brand the 'revolutionary' is no doubt talking 'Revolution' by a pool in Malibu today basking in the unconditional love of people who still don't have shit. But who are still dependent on the BBC for their opinions.

      Delete
    2. The whole of the hippy and music scene from the 60's was created by the CIA.
      http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr93.html

      Delete
    3. http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr93.html
      read this, it may help.

      Delete
  22. Jimmy Savile has absolutely fuck all to do with anything.

    Russell Brand does not look like 'Christ'. If Christ even existed he definitely would not of been white.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I just don't understand this article or what its intent is at all... A couple paragraphs with filler and a point that because he looks like Christ people listen to him???? What???? Well, I don't believe in Christ and I am listening to what he is saying... NO he doesn't put some weird trance on me and I am not being brainwashed by the presence of an assumable Christ... thanks for trying though ;)

    ReplyDelete
  24. Personally I don't need a celeb to validate what I believe in thank you. Russell speaks the truth here and far from what the article suggests am I asleep now but wide awake! Good to see some familiar celebs taking on the role to share the awareness from the heart far from a distraction but an awakening!

    ReplyDelete
  25. MORE ON RUSSEL BRAND :

    The applause is not ALL for him. It's mostly for what he says in a high profile public mainstream fora. It's what we all feel - an elephant in the room of mainstream media that no-one is talking about. Power is both corrupt and at present unaccountable to us, the people.

    Attacking him is pointless. So is idolising him. 'Ad hominems' have no scientific value.Neither does judgementalism - if anything is anti-science, almost religious. Anyways....

    Using the FACTS of the situation may help to some degree.

    For example : Getting on with understanding how power works,where the addiction to power emerges from in the human experience, and how to avoid it's pitfalls so that if a change comes, we are ready for it - in terms of skill sets, experience, empathy, self control and discipline - the exact opposite of what all previous 'revolutions' stimulated by Power have delivered.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Paxman is a fool and a double talking ahole. I always find idiots like him so irritating. Brand is so clear and shows Paxman to be a complete tool and shill. He needs to retire and quit undermining real communication. Brand is right voting is less than worthless and this guy keep pushing his strawman arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Thank God! I was beginning to feel quite nauseous at the amount of virtual smoke I have seen being blown up Mr. Brands ass today merely for stating the bleedin' obvious! The vacuous, nebulous twaddle being spun out to Paxman - that looked down on him benignly like a school master with a particularly precocious pupil was on the verge of vomit inducing! And all this times to coincide with Mr. Brand venturing forth around the world on his tour of a stand-up routine centered on what exactly? Yes, you guessed it: Revolution! A blatant PR stunt in my opinion - and when I called out Mr. Brand on Twitter this morning to explain himself - he was content to retweet the plaudits of his showbiz chums - so no surprise there, eh? Well done on this article - I was in desperate need of some balance... as i said earlier - it was beginning to feel as if I were the only one to have noticed that this particular Emperor was wearing no clothes!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bard Llys m not an avid online debater, but i had a bit of a dream about this story when i fell asleep... During the last election, few were going to vote labour again , in the few months before the election the vote lib dem propaganda started quite heavily amongst the student community, they didnt stand much chance of hitting an overwhelming majority to fix their position of sole leadership , and thus it was inevitable that conservative would share the slot,... now bear with me .... If russel inspires a large portion of students , and others, not to vote in the next elecion , it will be primarily , lib dem ,labour, and some of the lower band parties that do so ...it will however , hold little sway over the bulk of tory supporters , thus helping to guarantee a tory majority in the next election, am i right on this? it clearly wont be enough with russell alone, but if a few more celebs were to piggyback on it insired by russels charm it could be weilded to a prettry effective level, ... sorry bout the grammar, still asleep haha

    ReplyDelete
  29. I agree with Mr Brand he may a celebrity and i cant stand most of them, but If someone is stating what most people think your article is just utter crap, cant you come up with something more than this. Stop jumping on the bandwagon and get a grip. Brand can come across as an ass but when he was on the Question Time panel a while back he was the only person that spoke sense, stop your lazy journo shit and get a grip.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I agree with Mr Brand he may a celebrity and i cant stand most of them, but If someone is stating what most people think your article is just utter crap, cant you come up with something more than this. Stop jumping on the bandwagon and get a grip. Brand can come across as an ass but when he was on the Question Time panel a while back he was the only person that spoke sense, stop your lazy journo shit and get a grip.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Your talking utter crap, people agree with Brand because he is stating the truth. Its sad you feel the need to criticize someone who speaks the way the working classes feel for your own little agenda. Your a bit like modern art, very poor, appeals to a selective few and creates a reaction more than anything creative, good or positive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Russell Brand shook the Queen's hand and he's a Revolutionary apparently now - I would of called her a 'Parasite' to her face and I'm the one being attacked by Truthers. Very sad.

      Russell Brand the 'revolutionary' is no doubt talking 'Revolution' by a pool in Malibu today basking in the unconditional love of people who still don't have shit. But who are still dependent on the BBC for their opinions.

      Delete
  32. Jimmy Saville??!! This is obviously just an article aimed at winding up Russell Brand supporters as it makes absolutely no sense at all. If someone in the stoplight can encourage people to think critically for themselves then I think that is a good thing. A lot of people have no idea about the 99 percent to 1 percent wealth distribution which is so obvious to some of us. Its not about needing a celebrity for self validation, its about getting the word out to more people. The lies of society can't be contained anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Jeez.....the reality is that all of us can just carry on rolling on our backs to have our bellies tickled by whoever is controlling everything. It doesnt matter what anyone does or says.....things are not going to change. History proves it. There is no point resisting. Just go with the flow, try to fit in until you slip your mortal coil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, Cameron.

      Delete
    2. Russell Brand shook the Queen's hand and he's a Revolutionary apparently now - I would of called her a 'Parasite' to her face and I'm the one being attacked by Truthers. Very sad.

      Russell Brand the 'revolutionary' is no doubt talking 'Revolution' by a pool in Malibu today basking in the unconditional love of people who still don't have shit. But who are still dependent on the BBC for their opinions.

      Delete
  34. i like turtles

    ReplyDelete
  35. Ha! He's got your attention then Tom! Job done.

    ReplyDelete
  36. After knowing Russell Brand for over 15 years and being on tour with Noel Gallagher i can assure you Mr Brands intentions are pure.

    He's playing in a pit infested with snakes. He's doing a pretty good job at keeping his head above water. Why is this? He's not able to be blackmailed and the security services hate it. "oh look, russells got caught up in another sex scandel" Who cares - it what he does.

    Mr Gallagher also knows how to play the system and knows if he goes too much into politics he'll be on the Lennon path (and we all know how that panned out).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting. thanks for this.

      Delete
    2. I am not interested in Rusel Brand's personal life. That is his own private business.

      Your real government are the bankers.

      The politicians are just fronts or 'fall guys' for the public to hate. Remember this the next time Russell Brand is attacking politicians and then look at the banking families sitting at the dinner table with Russell Brand.

      Apply cognitive processing, measured thinking, objective analysis and then ask yourself why isn't 'Our Russ' making jokes about the Goldsmiths and Rothschilds whom he is very personally surrounded by?

      A whole other version of reality will come crashing in then. The one that really matters.

      Delete
  37. No I don't need my beliefs validating but I don't think the bbc is your enemy here. Thid twat has the PM's ear when it comes to drug treatment and is telling him how he hit off drugs is the only way to do it. This is obviously not true. He can only represent himself with asinine views.

    ReplyDelete
  38. You are so right ! Russell Brand rebel of the system? See how loud Hollywood was over Syria? You think they let the likes of Brand spout his nonsense if he was not supporting the establishment line? Don't be naive. We have been suffering the ills of the socialist subversive agenda, now they are going to offer the answer!! The E.U socialist policies are killing us ! It is the socialist agenda !!! EUSSR !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ive spent the last 10 minutes reading these comments and this is the first one the hit the nail on the head. You are exactly right. There's a fine line Brand walks-and many others like him also-e.g. the Zeitgeist movement, that calls for revolution and presents some sort of answer that on the end is a socialist agenda. Don't pay attention to what Brand is criticizing- we already know about that. Pay attention to what he is promoting. If you look hard enough, whether consciously or unconsciously, its a social agenda to its core.

      Delete
  39. I would strongly suggest people watch this video. Yuri Bezminov - Subversion and Demoralisation. They have been destroying the nations on purpose, now they will offer us the solution. Communist/Socialist = Less Freedom.
    We have a corrupt banking system yes ! Communism/socialism is not answer !
    The only way is for countries to retake control over the Banking system. Marxism is evil look at it's fruits has never done any good in this world.

    ReplyDelete
  40. "it's not just the BBC reporting wt7 falling 23 minutes before it did on 9/11, it''s also the Jimmy savile/ royal family/ government/ paedophile connections. That's why I want to see a revolution - the whole thing's depraved and disgusting, right at the very top of British 'society'. I think when the people investigate this for themselves, as they can so easily do on the internet, they are going to be horrified at what they discover."

    - Russell Brand

    ReplyDelete
  41. Give me a break. Accusations with no support. Russel Brand is MI6 and Jim Morrison is CIA. This explains perfectly why Russel Brand is "Christ-like"(for the 2nd coming) and why Morrison was "the Lizard King"(reptilian bloodline). Stoopid! This is exactly why other people do not take so called "researchers of truth" or those that say they are "awake" seriously. If awake means you are delusional and believe any assertion put forth on face value with no substantial evidence to support it, then consider me an asleep sheep.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think America is heading towards being a Police State. Should I wait for "evidence" before discussing it ,lest I be ridiculed ? :-)

      Delete
  42. i like flowers

    ReplyDelete
  43. Wait for him to appear on The Alex Jones Show. Again. Even Graham Hancock's singing his praises. Yaawn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah that damned Hancock with his meticulous research and infuriating use of evidence

      Delete
  44. Thomas just like Russell is full of contradictions and hypocrisy but i still admire and will give a little time to their voices now and then.

    This piece is not really an attack on Brand although there are numerous attempts to slur Brand in an unintelligent and unfounded manner, 'middle class' ' pseudo intellectual'. 'MI5 agent' This is more an attack on people who Sheridan considers to be not as awake as him and his beloved followers.

    There is a definite tone of begrudgery to this piece, maybe it bothers you that you are not going to get the same attention as a 'media luvvie' . This Brand interview or any incident when a public person expresses passion or anger about the system does release the tension and suffering of the 'working' classes who have to grind their way through the day to survive for themselves and their families and if they can find the time to research and become awakened at any so called level they are heroes in my opinion.

    But not to you Thomas, you seem to get very angry at people you perceive to be sheeple within these online communities. Shame on your arrogance and hypocrisy, as i have heard you numerous times berating others for referring to human beings as sheeple.

    I have alot of time for your work and your voice but unfortunately you come across as an arrogant gasbag with some underlying issues and bias. It amazes me how in interview after interview you can generally be about 50% sublime genius and the other 50% badly researched rants. What is so dissapointing is the hosts generally respond with ' wow amazing interesting' rather than with some critical thinking and constructive challenges to your claims.

    Maybe you should be more careful and balanced in your rants and not rely so heavily on your sometimes fawning fans to appease your ego and stop being such a prima donna when you write something that so many people find badly written and ugly.
    You are part of the MEDIA now whether you like it or not and should be accountable for what you write.

    This movement has no future unless we tame our egos and try to be as helpful and constructive to each other as possible with the ability to be astute critical thinkers. Try whitewash that as being 'spiritual new age bullshit', its jus common sense, somerthing severely lacking in this circus of a world whether it be the mainstream or the alternative/underground.

    Empathy for me is the only necessary element in any revolution, and that is something both you and russell have fortunately, we can point to people's fortune in life and accuse them of being hypocrites but that has a whiff of marxism to me, berating someone for their wealth which in Brands case has been won by hard work and talent.

    Shaking the hand of the queen? cherrypicking a photo like that as evidence is lame, im sure if we did a list of all the musicians writers poets etc who have been in a position to shake the queens hand, they are all fakes too, and judgig by that photo it was a good few years ago where he hadnt been so involved in this collective awakening process.

    Referring to him as a pseudo intellectual is hysterically hypocritical from you or denegrating his sincerity by referring to him as what you perceive as 'middle class'.
    Havent u been attacked and smeared as a non academic or dirty implications made about your lack of education and background (Ballymun). Having grown up in mixed backgrounds myself and having spent a few years in a dublin private school which made me a very angry young man, i can tell you Brand is not one of those middle class pricks, not in any shape or form.

    I wrote this last year to exorcise that desire to FOLLOW others.

    http://cocoonsoon.blogspot.ie/2012/12/there-are-no-barriers-to-truth.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. get rid of your ego and uniqueperspective become a clean cut truthmachine offence is an offence lets all play ring a ring rosey

      Delete
    2. I like it!!!

      Delete
  45. The idea that Russel Brand is being put on the BBC to make people "forget about Jimmy Saville" is one of the most utterly ridiculous, paranoid pieces of nonsense I have ever heard. Yes, I'm sure the executives at the BBC sat around in a meeting to say, "This Saville thing is getting out of hand! Let's wait a few months and then have a comedian do a 10 minute interview on Newsnight about something totally unrelated! THAT will fix everything!"

    Is there really ANYONE who feels angry about what happened with Saville who, upon seeing this interview, would just put aside their thoughts about all that and forget about it? Ridiculous!

    The subjects Brand was talking about have no relation to Saville, and nobody is looking to him for "validation" of their opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  46. And your evidence is what exactly? I'll happily listen to it and base my views on that. Does any exist that Russell Brand is a CIA mind-controlled shill working with the Royal Family to put people "back to sleep"?

    * PS: Sorry for the Anon comment, can't be bothered logging in.

    ReplyDelete
  47. maybe sheep like ...you assume we all are need someone like you Thomas to guide us towards the light......You say some good things then ...just when I think you are coming from the right place you attack someone ....almost makes me think youre jealous of Russell Brands ability to have his voice heard on msm ....as you seem to put lots of energy into self promotion and have only a minuscule following compared to RB

    ReplyDelete
  48. Mr. Thomas is very much on track...Despite Brand’s refreshing candor and undeniable charm, his misunderstanding of the true nature of centralization of government power is unforgivable. It’s intellectually lazy and in truth, dangerous.

    We would recommend to take a closer look on Russell Brand TM background
    http://goo.gl/VjLSZ0
    http://goo.gl/4Hhi0z

    ReplyDelete
  49. I think we really need to ask ourselves if those who control the flow of information would allow anyone who posed a threat to them near an audience.

    Notice how all celebs, just like politicos or indeed anyone in the public eye, always come together and toe the official line or concensus on the things that matter to the state.

    Thats because they are all vetted BEFORE they become successfull, those who may rock the boat in future, such as popstars, just dont make it. And those who have made it and then turn against their masters end up discredited or dead.

    If its on the screen its not to be trusted, unless the resistance have stormed the BBC studios to get the message out :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This right here is a central misconception in "Truther" philosophy, one that leads to many distorted conclusions.

      This assumption that all mainstream media is 100% controlled and anything you hear on it is part of some grand "agenda" is simply not true. There are many instances of highly anti-establishment messages being widely distributed through the media.

      The assertion that all celebrities are "vetted" is entirely baseless with no supporting evidence whatsoever. It is an article of "Truther mythology". Where are all these celebrities "coming together to toe the official line" you speak of?

      This idea is so full of cognitive dissonance that it leads its believers to think the exact opposite of what they're seeing right before their eyes.

      Delete
    2. Misconception?

      Everything you read or watch has been carefully scripted, from Newsnight to children's tv. Audiences are vetted, questions pre written (as proved a couple of years ago on Question Time). Only last week one Beeb political show host emphasised that questions arent pre selected...are you so naive to believe that in post Common Purpose/Leveson Britain that anyone who dares threaten the status quo would get an opportunity to?

      And I will qualify that they all toe the party line, sure celebs like Brand may well tickle at certain subjects, but just like the media that informs us daily how bad things are, they always fall short of offering a solution or an avenue for change. And they all sing from the same song sheet when it comes to anything to do with the royal family etc, and they never but never run a headline exposing the royals are Britains biggest benefit cheats-but week after week we have some made up chav family being investigated-why not tell the truth? Or are you one of those flag wavers who thinks its ok for the already wealthy to swindle more from the taxpayer while no doubt advocating that those chavs get their hands cut off..more cognitive dissonance???

      The casting couch was once used primarily for sex, maybe still so given the likes of Saville, now its what you know and what you may say. I have a friend who belonged to a very up and coming music group, a shade on the outspoken side but excellent-think The Jam. They were on the verge of making it and they got a visit from industry "suits" and needless to say they didnt agree with "toning it down" so low and behold the gigs dried up.

      I take it you are of an age when you remember when pop music did allow some social comment? We all thought Oasis were wonderfull didnt we?, although their music was very safe and did they not have tea with a certain Mr Charles Lynton Blair?

      Or how about the US punk music of the last few years, tame and a shadow of what it was-and then you have the likes of Tupac and Biggsy who talked out loud and paid the price for it?

      This is not truther mythology pal, just common sense, we are living in a time when the war for your thoughts is being played on every level, propaganda has never been so popular, we have massive wealth in the hands of a few people who also just happen to own the media that form many of those thoughts and views.

      I would argue that cognitive dissonance is to ignore what is really happening, and to abstain from critical thought. maybe the best way to put it is if you had that kind of illgotten power and wealth, and access to the tools to shape the minds of the masses so that they didnt ask or fight back, wouldnt you control what they were being told?, because I sure the hell would.

      If you seriously think a man that has friends like the Goldsmiths and Redshields, lives in a 2.2 million pound house and mixes with royalty is going to be on the side of the plebs or proles, whatever Socialist term he has for you, then you need help bud.

      Delete
    3. What you say (and the general consensus in the "alt truth" world) suggests a highly deliberate and purposeful agenda on the part of the shadowy "powers that be", a plan or scheme to direct the whole of society in a certain way. I used to believe that too, but as I've got older and become more informed, I can see that such a plan is simply impossible. There is too much chaos, too many variables to impose the kind of strict vectoring imagined by conspiracy theorists.

      This is not to say there is no influence at all over society from the media, of course there is, but in the Truther perception of reality Big Media is some kind of god-like force that the "sheep" have no resistance to. It's not true.

      The experience of your friend in the band is not uncommon, but the question is... were those "suits" acting on some secret social agenda, or were they acting on their business instincts? Our culture is currently full of trash because that's what sells, and the "suits" know it. They have no interest in pushing anything other than what is profitable. So many cultural and social conspiracy theories can be more simply explained by the action of greed and profit.

      The establishment will try to align itself with whatever is popular. A side effect of this is often a diminishing of the power of the thing they've aligned with.

      The amount of money a person possesses should not be a factor in our judgement of them. There are great and benevolent rich people, and there are poor people who are bastards, and every shade of grey in between. Brand has met a few royals at events like the Royal Variety Performance. A few handshakes hardly qualifies him as "mixing with royalty". His relationship with Jemima Khan is now *over*, and when they were together it was condemned by her family, they did not approve. Brand regularly hangs out with homeless people.

      Delete
  50. I was with Brand 90% of the way, but the two things that made me feel extremely uncomfortable with his "performance" is that he calls for SOCIALISM which historically has proven never to be about the people but always about CONTROL & SLAVERY of the people. Secondly, he buys into the CLIMATE CHANGE con, which is not about taking care of our planet, but another form of CONTROL & SLAVERY, ie a new religion for atheists/Catholic Church 2.0

    ReplyDelete
  51. Did everyone catch this: "socialist egalitarian system"; "single system managed by Administration Bots"; "centralized administrative system"; "heavy taxation of corporations"; "massive responsibility by the energy companies for exploiting the environment" in the BBC interview?

    This is a stage play.

    I wondered why Russell Brand was getting so much attention. I don't think he's very funny yet they call him a comedian. Now he's a magazine editor.

    He's a useful idiot global governance under a technocratic system of management.

    BBC is sophisticated with years of this kind of wag the dog stories.

    ReplyDelete
  52. I can only see Russell's ranting as something positive, he is at least pointing to some real problems. I am not impressed by his looks or his status, but rather see him as just another human being being fed up with all the crap that surrounds us.

    ReplyDelete
  53. It is patronizing in the extreme to be told that we are being duped into believing that we are safe because Brand speaks out, either with Paxman or the GQ Hugo Boss Awards, and that we will then sit back and wait for our cause to be fought on TV. People of Scotland, intelligent enough to be on the Yes Campaign for independence have long since familiarised themselves with the big picture - i.e. the inexorable march towards corporate fascist enslavement. We understand the bias of the mainstream media as we witness it filtering our news every day. We are taking action, Russell Brand is simply stating the reasons why.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I think this is a very opinionated article... Your opinions are very judgmental and somewhat dated. I mean you slate the middle class, you think because someone has a resemblance to "Jesus" means all Christians will follow him and this is in no way taking peoples thoughts away from Jimmy Saville.. I mean come on! I think Russell speaks a lot of truth, and in my opinion (from the interview) I have seen more people take their head out of the sand than putting people back to sleep! However... the fact that this very controversial conversation is taking place in its self is a good thing!

    ReplyDelete
  55. russell brand is very talented, funny, gorgeous and WIDE AWAKE! i think there are a lot of guys who are just jealous of him....great guy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lilly listen to what he says. he is smarter than pax man yet allows pax man to dominate the conversation. what would paxman have said if russel said something like this.

      Mr pax man 70% of our laws come from europe. do you think if i vote for a polician in brussels that would make a difference. Mr pax man the queen and prince charles have the power through veto legally to veto any decision in the uk parliament if it goes against their business interests. the queen is a banker and runs thousands of business. so that means most things. how does my vote change this. Instead he came off with purlile rubbish for simpletons, why else would he be picked by the government itself to promote drug causes and be a spokesman. sorry lilly your an idiot..

      Delete
  56. Look at the masonic handshake he's giving queenie!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. baron charles foster drake29 October 2013 20:30

      ya
      such a quaint handy shake from a dapper dickensian tavistock character 2 a gotha german vampyre queen.
      all smiles.
      no talk of the missing children of canada.
      no loose talk of dead bodies found on large estate.
      no chit or chat of unkle jimmy and his cum ings and go ings.
      no talk of his organ trading.
      just smiles.
      here here eye says.
      keep your eyes wide shut lord rothschild's new creature is here.
      look at the eyes modelling a cockney jewish rasputin full deep bbc mi training.
      and such a good mk handler.
      arise the new unkle jimmy is dead long live king cock brand x

      Delete
  57. I am not sure Russell Brand is being used or insincere and disingenuous in his attempts to 'wake up' people, just misdirected and generally missing the real point.

    I agree that his getting the limelight to expound his opinions has been careful adjudged by the mainstream media to act as a pressure-relief valve, though, and many may now just relax and think that the battle is being won. They would be wrong in that assumption if they chose to divert their energies and gaze elsewhere. The battle to regain democracy has only just begun.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Hello Thomas, you said Jim Morrison was a CIA creation, can you expand on this please? I know his father was a high ranking naval captain....
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. check this out: http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr93.html There are multiple articles on the topic. Scroll down the page to find "Laurel Canyon" info.

      Delete
  59. With all due respect, I think that this blog

    http://dugpasandtheirrole.wordpress.com/

    is where you may have got your info about Brand, whoever runs this blog has been talking about the things you are saying for a couple of years and has some excellent information.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PurplePebble certainly knows their stuff.

      Delete
    2. That blog is incredibly hard to read.

      Delete
  60. lord charles drake30 October 2013 18:56

    rusal brand is brilent innit he should marry adele and we can have working class royalty.
    day could have babies and all of sing songs in der est end knees up day are both amazin.
    team gb and the olympics wads amazin as well russel played the child snatcheror he was amazin in der parts.
    he was right scary kidnappin dem kids un all.
    we are so lucky have edele and russel they both love the queen and shakes hands very dainty delicate like wive her amazin majesty paul mcartney and cliff richard to.
    my dads a mason he is amazin espeshully the times when he not rapin me.
    he calls it energy harvestin.

    they tryed to put amy winehouse inside a triangle pyramid and she told um to fuck off

    ReplyDelete
  61. What a load of Rubbish, Brand doesn't work for the BBC, he works for him self. He has no contract with them. He gets no money from them. This was just an interview for Paxman to attack why a political mag was being edited by Brand. Thats it and it ended up with Brand speaking his mind. I am all for moving towards a new system and 95% of the time I love my fellow free thinkers. But really this piece of utter, utter bollocks.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I heard your Red Ice interview and I respectfully disagree with your take on the "Brand" issue. It's like we watched two different broadcasts. I dig your stuff, but I hardly think this celebrity is the embedded sleeper agent you imply. His general points seemed to encourage others to opt out of our status quo. Now if you want to take abstractions like "socialism" and demonize all those who hold to such tenets, that is another issue. Whether one believed capitalism is a sacred cow, and our current mafia form of it prevailing today is but a deformity of market principles, fine. But there are others who believe the accumulation of capital will always evolve or tend to collusion and thus become a monster as is the current paradigm. My issue is that socialism is a wide moniker, and not merely a covert tool used by the oligarchy running the world. Thus false assumptions enter into such a debate because we all have certain predispositions and unacknowledged assumptions about these political abstractions. One could revel in the fact that a celebrity is expressing what everyone is thinking, gaining exposure into our world of lies. Perhaps off the cuff Brand msy not espouse perfect antidotes, but his key message was that we should all be outraged and opt out of an illegitimate polity running the world into ruin. Anyone here disagree? Fabian socialists are a dirty word, apparently, but Bertrand Russell was an intellectual giant who was among the first to reject the Warren Commission on JFK.
    More review of Brand is needed; but such a vigorous attack on one of the few celebrities that speaks truth to power is a good thing, even if he doesn't prescribe each of our personal agendas.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Thomas good on you for posting this material about Mr Brandy. There is a nice English word for someone like this and its Ponce,

    I tried to find a good definition of this word but I could not. I include one from online below. But he is basically an Area Boy Made good - Spirit of PrimRose Hill meets the wide toothy grin of Essex Boys. An East End boy who likes West End Girls playing on the Empire Estate. The best of a bad bunch of Good Mixers and Bucks Head CamDen Graduates

    He is a good actor and intermediary which ultimately is what Ponces are. They use their social position to leverage a free beer.


    Ponce Internet Definition - not even close to UK Slang Meaning
    Term originated in the UK and came to prominence in the 1960's, initially to describe a pimp. In Spanish it means "prince" and could have either been referring to the fancy, over-the-top clothing and jewelry popular with pimps, or because he was surrounded by a harem of women, involved in the underworld, but usually not the actual "king" of the area (he had to pay tribute to use the block or neighborhood).

    Now it is generally used to refer to someone (usually a male) who dresses in nicer clothing and acts in a polished fashion; often interchangable with fag or pussy, but not necessarily as derogatory: a ponce is not necessarily homosexual, nor are they necessarily passive or weak, but they would tend to be thought of as metrosexual or gay in their manner of dress.

    In the US it also takes a bit of a tone for a poser or wannabe, primarily in the punk, ska, or artsy scenes.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Thomas, great interview on red Ice.

    I cant stand Brand but only started to watch the interview because of all the hype it was generating. I admit I didnt watch it all but thought " ok ...this guy is for the people and evening up the unequality" etc.
    It wasnt until I listened to your interview with Henryk that I went "dohh" and slapped my forehead.
    I never knew the "new statesman" was Fabian, I never knew "jemima khan" was his girl friend or her father was a billionaire and her brothers were married to Rothschilds
    .
    Period.

    I have read some of David Ickes books over the years , and I know of the manipulation going on but if you dont keep up your guard, you get dragged back into the "matrix" as such. This is why I watched even a bit...because Brand had Icke on a TV program he was hosting....even though it appeared a bit awkward.
    .
    I was a young socialist back years ago and thought this is the bees knees then found out the real truth about communism/socialism...total control......it took me years and ONLY through alternative media. The left/right paradigm is a load of rot. Its like the "climatism" we have now...total control. It appears Brands ideas will meld with these cultists. But what you state about the Saville affair seems to be correct and that the Beeb is trying to blanket it out.
    Icke was right....and like the David Kelly affair , unless people start to look with an open mind, it may get down played but I dont think it will go away but people will not see the cover ups as they come.

    ReplyDelete
  65. i was excited by brand recent media performances, cant really think of any other high profile celeb talking about meditation and yoga, the 'flip' side i'm reading here is upsetting because i have no way to prove if any of it is reality

    ReplyDelete
  66. Hi,
    I'm A-nja. Let me ask everybody who is in the "truth-movement" some questions.

    1. Do you really think there can be an outer revolution before there was an inner revolution?

    2. Can somebody who doesn't even know himself lead a crowd to a "better world"?

    3. Can anything be achived without self-knowledge? What do you actually know if you don't even know yourself?

    4. Do you think someone like Jesus Christ incarnated into a poor familiy for no reason?

    5. Do you think that somebody who is involved in the media-business, who is an actor, can be a true leader?

    6. Don't you think that a heroine-addict can lead you somewhere? Take away his drug and you will see what his true interest is.

    7. Do you really belief that a popular media person can serve a purpose that is something other than narcisistic self supply? How naive are you? Why is he in that position in the first place? Question the motives properly, please.

    8. Critizising Thomas for his work is like rejecting to drink you mothers milk although you are a baby.

    9. Without knowing yourself what is known?

    10. First things first! First know yourself and than change the world. An outer revolution will not change you. It only changes the appearance but not the cause of it.

    11. Without knowing what this world is you find yourself in you know nothing at all.

    12. If you want to change something change your wrong perspective first. You want some nice furniture in your prison? Well...go for it!

    13. As long as you belief anything that is presented by the mainstream media you are deluded.

    14. What is the purpose of mainstream media? Don't you know it by now?

    15. You are a stupid lot if you think you can beat the system by running against their walls.

    16. The perverse rulers will allways laugh about you if you don't know who you are because they DO KNOW who THEY are.

    17. Without true self-knowledge nothing is gained. They will laught behind closed doors because they know and you don't.

    18. Answer these questions for yourself else you will never make any difference:
    Who or what am I? What is this place I find myself in? What is this world? Why and what for am I here? Where do I come from? Where do I go to?

    19. If you KNOW the answers you win the battle. Else you will be the reason for their laughter.

    20. Don't get me wrong, please. I'm all for you. IF YOU KNOW. Else: Enjoy your delusion!

    ReplyDelete
  67. Calling Brand a "pseudo-intellectual, overpaid, middle-class, media luvvie" is so immature and off the mark. It rings more like jealously that reality.

    What would YOUR definition be of a REAL "intellectual"?

    All this grousing about Russell Brand by seemingly Russell Brand "wish I could be's"
    Haaaaa! Brand is a genius who candidly speaks his mind, even if what he discusses is off-mainstream and doomed to be ridiculed by fools, which it clearly is here.

    Good luck you guys - Brand is on fire, while Thomas and many of you seem more like wet blankets.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Thomas Sheridan has nothing but trash to offer- whats youre great plan Thomas ? Other than trash people who dare to make SOME kind of upstir in the press-like R.Brand. He´s bound to be trashed, but that you,Sheridan, would lead the choir is just.... well,- it just talks to you person-all the names you so happely call Brand-"Junkie" offcourse you have to use the dirtiest trick in the book- "Junkie" How low can you get as a human being !

    ReplyDelete
  69. What a load of garbage... Russel Brand is not acting with the BBC. He is not hiding behind bureaucracy, he is in fact, delivering truths that mainstream media is petrified to do.

    Take channels 4's Benefit Street or indeed previously The Scheme... mirroring Westminster's image of 'scroungers' when in fact the real scroungers are the fat cats in corporation, and would you believe it, the bleeding MP's themselves with there subsidies costing over 50 times the Welfare bill.

    This article is yet another middle/upper class kick in the proverbial balls to the REAL hardworking people. The minimum wagers cleaning your offices, cutting your hair, scanning your shopping items... REAL hardworking citizen. Not rich, using daddy's money but will still take all I can get off the state, liars!

    Mr Cameron seems to think the only hardworking people are those wealthy enough to perhaps make sizable donations to his, already a mass of wealth, political agenda.

    No one will ever forget the evil of the Jimmy Saville fracas... The same as no one will ever forget Myra Hindley or Ian Huntly. And those two were nobody's, not a once uber-popular Radio DJ.

    People who say 'the system works' work for the system...

    ReplyDelete
  70. What a load of garbage... Russel Brand is not acting with the BBC. He is not hiding behind bureaucracy, he is in fact, delivering truths that mainstream media is petrified to do.

    Take channels 4's Benefit Street or indeed previously The Scheme... mirroring Westminster's image of 'scroungers' when in fact the real scroungers are the fat cats in corporation, and would you believe it, the bleeding MP's themselves with there subsidies costing over 50 times the Welfare bill.

    This article is yet another middle/upper class kick in the proverbial balls to the REAL hardworking people. The minimum wagers cleaning your offices, cutting your hair, scanning your shopping items... REAL hardworking citizen. Not rich, using daddy's money but will still take all I can get off the state, liars!

    Mr Cameron seems to think the only hardworking people are those wealthy enough to perhaps make sizable donations to his, already a mass of wealth, political agenda.

    No one will ever forget the evil of the Jimmy Saville fracas... The same as no one will ever forget Myra Hindley or Ian Huntly. And those two were nobody's, not a once uber-popular Radio DJ.

    People who say 'the system works' work for the system...

    ReplyDelete
  71. Thomas, just out of interest, is there anyone (in the media) you haven't got a conspiracy theory about?

    ReplyDelete